Is Vanguard In Denial?

PUBLISHED Nov 9, 2022, 11:02:42 PM        SHARE

imgChimp Investor Blog

If you enjoy reading this blog, please leave a star rating on WealthTender. Thank you!

The manager of the huge passive balanced fund range is clearly conflicted

I have been writing for a while now about the issue of balanced funds being broken. In 2017, I wrote:

Are there ‘suitability’ issues in relation to putting clients into passive multi-asset funds that have massive bond risk? Back in 2008, the real 10-year Gilt yield was around 1%. Although this was low – 10 years earlier real yields were 4% - one could still justify buying Gilts on the basis that the real yield was positive. Fast forward to today and real 10-year interest rates in the UK are close to -2%. This means that if you buy them and hold them to maturity, your real return will be -2% per annum (-1.79% to be precise). To make money in real terms, real yields would have to fall further and you’d have to sell the bonds before maturity. But yields are already at -2%! Expecting them to fall to, say, -3% is, in my humble opinion, not investing but speculation. In the previous section, I mentioned four providers of the more popular passive multi-asset funds. If you consider their offerings that sit in the IA Mixed Investment 20-60% Shares sector, they generally have around 40% in equities. Where is the other 60%? All or mostly in bonds, where one has to be lucky to win. In other words, are these funds really suitable for your clients?

Two weeks ago, I wrote an article in Citywire titled Wealth Managers May Need A Complete Rethink about the inverted performance of risk rated funds. In between I've made numerous mention of the issue relating to bonds, one suggesting that they could represent The Next Mis-selling Scandal and, half seriously, that "Any adviser who put their clients into...Gilts, Treasuries, Bunds or JGBs, should be praying that their public liability insurance has been kept up to date."

Anyway, it's nice that the mainstream media is finally picking up on the story - see yesterday's FT article Vanguard’s low-risk UK strategies upended in 2022 market storm (subscription required).

The article states that "Vanguard’s £35bn UK Life Strategy funds range has been wrongfooted by simultaneous falls in bonds and stocks this year, leaving supposedly low risk portfolios nursing heavier losses than racier options." It is correct that the funds have been wrongfooted but it is not quite true that the falls in bonds and stocks this year have been "simultaneous". The falls in bonds have been much worse, which is why the supposedly low risk Vanguard funds that hold lots of bonds have fallen much more than the 'high risk' funds that don't. And not just this year but since mid-2020.

According to the article:

“It’s true to say that investors would generally expect lower-risk portfolios to perform relatively better when markets are performing badly,” said James Norton, head of financial planners at Vanguard UK. “Exceptions do happen, and this year is essentially one of those exceptions,” he added.

The topsy turvy period for Vanguard’s fund range is a prominent example of how the twin falls in stocks and bonds this year have upset conventional investment wisdom across the funds industry with harsh consequences for some retail investors.

Norton said he has a “huge amount of sympathy” for investors facing losses, but said the company’s research shows investors get better long-term returns by not reacting to or trying to anticipate short-term market moves. “When times are tough, human nature sets in. It feels like something is broken but it’s not,” he said. “Changing now, Vanguard would strongly urge, is not the right thing to do, whether you’re in Life Strategy or another portfolio that you built yourself.”

Mr Norton seems to think that this year's inverted bond/equity performance is an exception, recommending that investors hold their nerve. I would urge Mr Norton to take a look at how US balanced funds performed from 1965 to 1981: a low risk 80% bonds fund was down 45% in real terms, a high risk 20% bonds just 11%. 16 years is rather longer than 1 year.

As for Vanguard's research that he cites, I'd love to know whether it goes back far enough to be able to incorporate the last period of horrific bond performance from 1965 to 1981. Given its conclusion, I very much doubt it.

The article goes on:

Vanguard’s target-date retirement funds, which automatically tilt more towards bonds as they move closer to the client’s retirement date, were similarly afflicted. Funds with closer retirement dates lost more than those with longer horizons.

It is tragic that retirees are losing big at the very moment that they can least afford to. What if Mr Norton is wrong about this being a one year aberration? What then?

Next, the article notes that:

Vanguard has made inroads in the UK markets since it started selling funds directly to British buyers in 2017, adding 100,000 new clients so far this year. Life Strategy funds were three of the top five most-bought funds on Interactive Investor, the second-largest UK platform for DIY investors, in the first nine months of the year. So-called “balanced” portfolios that mix bonds and equities are a mainstay of the funds sector, on the basis that the counterweight of safe-haven fixed income will limit losses during downturns in the equities market.

The amount of money that has poured into passive funds, whether Vanguard's LifeStrategy funds, Blackrock's Consensus funds or others, is staggering. The companies are clearly conflicted when it comes to communicating messages about how long they think the poor bond performance will last.

Following the focus on Vanguard, the article then cites Kevin Doran at AJ Bell:

Kevin Doran, managing director at investment platform AJ Bell, said balanced portfolios across the sector have suffered as central banks shift from an era of easy money and try to fight inflation. “For a typical cautious portfolio with 80 per cent bonds, the theory is that a fall of more than 12.5 per cent should happen less than once in a hundred years. But in reality that is exactly what we’ve seen happen,” he said.

I would very much like to see the model on which Mr Doran's "once in a hundred years" comment is based. My guess is that it takes bonds' low short term volatility, assumes bond returns are normally distribution, and on that basis calculates the probability of a 12.5% fall over one year. If this is the case, the calculation is completely wrong. Bonds are always going to be lowly volatile on a short term basis so that is never going to give you any idea of what they can do on a multi-year basis - and indeed what they have done in the past. Rather than use short-term volatility, I would suggest to Mr Doran that he calculates volatility based on real 30 year returns, in which case he will find not only that 12.5% falls happen more often than once in a hundred years but that every few decades there can be a 10-15 year period in which bonds fall 60% in real terms.

The article finishes with:

Vanguard said its global investment committee had examined the unusual twin falls in bonds and equities this year, but concluded that in the long run the two types of securities were likely to revert to their normal pattern of moving in opposite directions. “We don’t change the asset allocation unless there is a fundamental shift in the market over the long term . . . We don’t think this positive correlation is the new norm,” said Mohneet Dhir, investment product manager, Life Strategy. “We are not moving the goalposts.”

First, I suspect Vanguard's investment committee is not taking account of what happens in sustained periods of high inflation as I think it should. Second, waiting for confirmation of "a fundamental shift in the market over the long term" will take years, by which time the horse may well have long bolted. Third, as previously mentioned, "positive correlation" could well be the new norm if high inflation persists, something that both history and theory say it might.

As for Mr Dhir's comment about "not moving the goalposts", the reality is that Vanguard has no choice - £35 billion is, after all, quite heavy.

The views expressed in this communication are those of Peter Elston at the time of writing and are subject to change without notice. They do not constitute investment advice and whilst all reasonable efforts have been used to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this communication, the reliability, completeness or accuracy of the content cannot be guaranteed. This communication provides information for professional use only and should not be relied upon by retail investors as the sole basis for investment.
© Chimp Investor Ltd
Originally Posted in Chimp Investor

Sound investments
don't happen alone

Find your crew, build teams, compete in VS MODE, and identify investment trends in our evergrowing investment ecosystem. You aren't on an island anymore, and our community is here to help you make informed decisions in a complex world.

More Reads
Hedging Interest Rate Risk With Real And Nominal Treasury Yields

The recent rise in real yields for inflation-indexed Treasuries (TIPS) looks compelling for locking in relatively attractive payout rates, but the usual risks with bonds still applies. That inspires looking at a somewhat unorthodox strategy of holding TIPS and conventional Treasuries as a hedging strategy.

How You Can Reduce Your Total Loan Cost [14 Easy Ways]

Whether it is a student loan, private loan, or federal loan, there are ways that you can use to reduce the total loan cost. Some situations can require you to take a loan, whether for personal use, emergencies, mortgage, or school fees, among other needs. When such cases are over, you are left with a huge debt to settle, and the best way for a loan is to find ways to reduce the total cost so that you can reduce the burden that comes with repayment.

Retirement for Introverts

There are a lot of introverts in the world, and they retire. I’m one of them, though I just figured out I am an introvert. There are a ton of implications if you are an introvert and retired. But it comes down to quality over quantity. Let’s explore.

Expectations in Retirement

We expect a lot out of Retirement. What if the key to a successful retirement is to lower our expectations? After all, we will spend a third or more of our life in Retirement. After all that hard work, should we not expect some happiness or at least fun? If you want happiness in Retirement, let me tell you why the key to retirement happiness is to lower your expectations.

Procter & Gamble Stock: Recession Resistant Dividend Aristocrat

When volatility grips the stock market, as it has this past year, income investors should focus on quality dividend growth stocks.

Dividend Income Summary: Lanny’s October 2022 Summary

This is what dividend investing is all about! Investing in dividend stocks allows YOU to earn dividend income, the best passive income stream! Bias, you better believe it.

Questions To Ask Before Hiring a Financial Planner or Coach

You can make all the right money moves to set your business up for success, but sometimes, it may seem hard to do that without the right team behind you. Whether you’re planning a major pivot or just looking to grow, hiring a financial planner or coach can be a great way to support your business on its journey.

The Dollar Edges Higher

After selling off amid speculation that China’s Covid policy was going to ease, we expected the greenback to recover and consolidate ahead of Thursday’s CPI.

How do you Take a Side Business to Full Business?

Going from side-gig to full-time gig? Make sure you take care of some administration before you take the plunge.

10 Compelling ESG Stocks That Pay Dividends Now

In the world of investing, the goal is always to compound wealth as efficiently as possible. We think the best way to do that is to buy high-quality dividend stocks, reinvest the dividends, and stay the course over a number of years. However, investors can also infuse their own personal preferences or beliefs into their investing strategy, and still make great returns.

Market Musing 11-07-2022 - Please Vote

The US Markets are waiting on FOMC Rate Hike of 75 basis points on Wednesday. Will Chair Powell pivot on rate hikes before the end of year?

What are the Dividend Policies of the Top Utility Stocks

When an income investor researches utility stocks, the dividend policy is an important decision factor. Here are the dividend policies of the top utility stocks and what they say about the stock.

AMC Stock Forecast, Analysis, Price & News | Is AMC stock a buy

Based on the stock performance over the previous 8 years, AMC has traditionally increased by 80.5% during the following 52 weeks. Learn more!

Is Planet Fitness a Buy or Sell? PLNT target price

Based in Hampton, New Hampshire, Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) is an American fitness facility franchisor and operator. Let's explore it!

The FED Strikes (back)

Stock Market Commentary

Fight, Flight, Freeze, Fawn, and the Stock Market

When I went to med school, fight or flight were the two options for an acute stress response. Well, I guess humans have evolved since then (or at least our understanding of them has), and now there are four acute stress responses: fight, flight, freeze, or fawn. Let’s look at the acute stress responses and see what they mean for stock market investors.

The Pros & Cons of Investing in Physical Gold

It is no secret that gold has been historically valued from ancient times until today. Just by describing why people appreciate it, you will already see the pros of this precious metal. People used gold in trading for a long time, and today, people are storing metal as a valuable investment.

Are we in an Index Fund Bubble?

Are we in an index fund bubble? Should you stay the course and keep investing, or should you sell and look for better opportunities? As with most things there is no one size fits all answer. The markets are in a state of turmoil, so it is easy to see why one would think that avoiding certain asset classes might be a good idea. Let’s take a look at index fund investing so you can see if it is right for you.

10 Ways to Find Affordable Prescription Medications

Every American knows that healthcare costs are expensive. Even if you have health insurance or Medicare, it isn’t always easy to find affordable prescription medications. Once you reach your annual spending limit, there is a coverage gap. This leaves patients to pay out of pocket for the medicine they need.

The Golden Rule of Personal Finance

The Leaning Tower of Pisa has a foundational problem. It’s 186 feet tall and weighs 14,500 tons. But its foundation is only 10 feet deep and built into silt and clay. Five years after construction (~1178 A.D.), the foundation shifted and the tower famously “leaned.” Oops.

Resources for Publishers
Resources for New Investors

Boosted with BossCoin